The shocking revelations from last Sunday’s interview with the Housing Authority’s CEO have sparked an uproar across the nation. Citizens, appalled by the CEO’s audacious remarks, flooded us with messages demanding that we denounce these heedless comments. The CEO’s preposterous claim that many couples opt to own two separate properties, rather than pooling resources into one, shows a staggering disconnect from reality. This cavalier attitude is a slap in the face to the hundreds of families struggling to survive in deplorable living conditions—families who can’t even claim the basic dignity of a private bathroom, some of whom are forced to live in garages.
These past weeks, I’ve sounded the alarm on the internal chaos plaguing the Housing Authority. As the lone voice unafraid to critique both the CEO and Minister for Social and Affordable Housing, Roderick Galdes, I’ve weathered a storm of backlash from the powers that be. In a desperate attempt to muzzle my scrutiny, the government, evidently rattled, dispatched a cadre of Galdes loyalists to incessantly disparage my work. But their futile efforts to silence my revelations will only harden my resolve to expose their perfidious machinations.
As word of this scandal spread, the Labour Party swiftly scrambled to mitigate the damage. A directive—strategically codenamed ‘Line To Take’—was issued to Labour MPs on how to stonewall Net News journalists. This orchestrated damage control playbook was leaked to me, revealing their clumsy attempt to salvage what’s left of the Minister’s reputation by highlighting so-called “achievements” in housing—empty gestures like grants or elevator installations, mere smokescreens for a failing system.
I extend my gratitude to the government deputies who bravely leaked this information, standing against the tide of incompetence and despairing of the housing debacle spiraling under Roderick Galdes’s watch. While some deputies chose conciliatory responses, others wielded the ‘Line To Take’ as a cudgel, targeting me personally. We’ll dissect their feeble defenses in due time.
Returning to the interview, many urged me to lambast Zerafa for his tone-deaf comments. Yet, pinning blame on him alone is shortsighted; he’s merely echoing the ethos of his superior. Focusing ire on the pawn when it’s the king orchestrating the game is futile.
Rest assured, as we delve deeper into this rabbit hole, more unsettling truths about the Ministry for Social and Affordable Housing will be unveiled. Stay vigilant.
1 Comment
Roderick was always a person who interlace with anyone to survive, are you so surprised?