This site has already made it clear: Georg Sapiano is not offering analysis — he is doing damage control. And he is doing it for a candidate whose leadership the Nationalist Party already tested, and then overwhelmingly rejected. Once was more than enough.
Adrian Delia
In his last social media post, Sapiano dressed up his commentary as if he were a Labour strategist. He pretended to show us how Labour would read the Borg–Delia debate. But let’s be honest — this was not analysis. This was an act of political theatre, a cheap gimmick designed to reframe the conversation inside PN ranks.
He thought he was being clever. Instead, what he revealed is that he knows nothing about Labour’s real political strategy. What he wrote is a farce, played out to mislead PN supporters while mocking them into accepting recycled leadership.
Sapiano wants readers to believe he understands Labour’s perspective. But rather than exposing Labour’s thinking, he only exposed his own agenda: polish up Delia’s image, spin the narrative, and hope PN members forget the reasons he was ousted in the first place.
The real question that Sapiano never answers is this:
Why should PN members and Maltese voters trust the recycled promises of Adrian Delia — a man who couldn’t even hold his parliamentary group together?
Sapiano can play strategist all he wants, but voters see through the smugness. They don’t need staged analysis or damage control. They deserve honesty.
