In the heart of Malta’s judicial system lies the Family Court, established to navigate the delicate terrain of separations, child custody, and maintenance under the Civil Code (Chapter 16 of the Laws of Malta). This court is tasked with upholding the “best interest of the child” as its paramount principle, a standard that, on paper, promotes gender neutrality.
Yet, beneath this facade, a growing chorus of voices from affected male individuals, alleges a systemic bias that disadvantages men, particularly in how requests are handled during separation processes.
Requests filed by women, such as those for maintenance or exclusive custody, are often swiftly accepted, while men’s applications for shared custody, access rights, or fair property division are reportedly delayed, rejected, or left undecided, violating the principle of “equality of arms.”
This disparity not only erodes trust in the judiciary but also perpetuates outdated stereotypes in a society still grappling with its conservative roots, despite reforms like the 2011 introduction of divorce and ongoing pushes for gender equality.
In this ongoing exposé, we delve into the heart-wrenching stories of inequality and injustice plaguing separation proceedings, with our primary focus on unmasking the actions of a particular Judge whose rulings have sparked widespread outrage.
Stay with us as we uncover the truth, one article at a time. Accountability starts with awareness.
