Reintroducing criminal libel

Share

It is indeed a gratifying moment to hear the Prime Minister reaffirm the necessity to address the misuse of freedom of expression by reinstating criminal libel laws.

 

This step is crucial in curbing the actions of a small group of individuals with malicious intentions. I take pride in having initiated this discourse last summer, and it is heartening to see it gaining momentum.

 

The acknowledgment of the detrimental effects of inaction and delay in addressing these issues, leading to a breeding ground for psychological terrorism, is a significant development.

 

While specific names were not mentioned, it is evident that certain individuals, such as Daphne Caruana Galizia, Manuel Delia, Mark Camilleri, Kevin Cassar, Andrew Borg-Cardona  and their cohorts, engage in practices that can be deemed as psychological terrorism.

 

 

The proliferation of slander through online platforms underscores the urgency of implementing measures to protect the public from those who misuse their journalistic privileges.

 

The reference to libel amounts not exceeding 11,646.87 Euros highlights the gravity of the situation, emphasizing the need for regulation in the realm of freedom of expression.

 

I extend my gratitude to the Prime Minister for addressing these pressing issues and urge for the introduction of legislation, such as the proposed ‘Daphne Law,’ to provide recourse for victims of abuse and defamation.

 

‘Daphne Law’ serves as a reminder of the origins of this toxic discourse, rooted in hatred and animosity. It is imperative to take decisive action to safeguard individuals from the harmful effects of such malicious practices.

 

Deus misereatur animae suae